According to Armstrong Explain the Difference Between Mythos and Logos

Posted on December 21 2014 by mservetus. Philosophers have been trying to explain the difference between mythos and logos for centuries.

Mythos And Logos

On fundamentalisms it is important to mention Karen Armstrong from whom this article borrowed the word play of logos and mythos7.

. As nouns the difference between logos and mythos is that logos is philosophy in presocratic philosophy the principle governing the cosmos in stoicism the active material rational principle of the cosmos or logos can be logo while mythos is a story or set of stories relevant to or having a significant truth or meaning for a particular culture religion society or other group. She emphasizes in the introduction the difference between what scholars call mythos and logos. The only thing that is agreed upon by all philosophers is that logos can be explained and mythos cannot.

The active beings in myths are generally gods and goddesses heroes and heroines or animals and plants. Human cultures usually include a cosmogonical or creation myth concerning the origins of the world or how the world came to exist. A myth also can be a story to explain why something exists.

Herodotus for instance uses mythos only twice but as has been observed he uses the term logos in a way that corresponds to what we would call myth 8 Chiara Bottici today36 When narrating two different versions of Helens. An example of mythos is the bible. Logos was reason logic intellect.

But logos alone couldnt speak to the deep question human beings ask like What is the meaning of life. Karen Armstrong discusses her new book A Short History of Myth which explores. Throughout the book Armstrong effectively uses the metaphors of mythos and logos myth and reason to describe the tension between the traditional religious worldview and that provided by.

Armstrongs assertion that most cultures made a distinction between religious belief mythos and rational belief logos is false. Human beings have always used myths as a framework on which to shape religion literature and early on science. In a previous post on the topic of mythos and logos I discussed the evolution of ancient Greek thought from its origins in imaginative legends about gods to the development of reason philosophy and logicToday every educated human being knows about the contributions of Socrates Plato Euclid and Pythagoras.

Karen Armstrongs response though was more artistic. According to this author fundamentalism is not only a response of society that dichotomized mythos and logos but is the fruit of modernity itself. It is an anachronistic distinction that has emerged from the late 20thC urge to preserve god in the face of the growing encroachment of reason and evidence that the previous claims of religion have proved false.

When read one cannot experiment with what is taught in the bible. Explain the difference between mythos and logos world-views. Armstrongs case rests on a distinction in religion and philosophy between mythos and logos two mutually exclusive approaches to knowing and unknowing.

The book quotes Karen Armstrong a writer on comparative religion on the difference between what the Greeks called mythos and logos. Both were recognized by scholars as legitimate. This is the most generic difference between the two.

She says Both were. In this book she studies and attempts to analyze fundamentalist movements in Christianity Judaism and Islam. Herodotos and the received version The traditional story - itself a kind of myth - sees Herodotos as a waystation on the Greek journey to rationalism in which the age of myth gave way to the age of reason or logos.

Mythos is a myhtical account to explain the unknown and is more concerned with the quality of the story. The former is represented by the earliest Greek thinkers such as Hesiod and Homer. She spoke of two complementary ways of arriving at truth which the Greeks called mythos and logos.

According to this story the opening pages of the Histories are a lesson in the shortcomings of mythology. The reading this week for my Scholars Seminar is the introduction of the book The Battle for God by Karen Armstrong. The distinction between what Karen Armstrong following earlier scholars currently refers to as mythos and logos is more familiar in other guises such as art versus science spirituality versus worldliness and values versus facts Armstrong 1993.

These however all lack quite the generality required referring to facets of the polarity in. According to Palmer although mythos and logos pretty much traces the originality of things in life yet mythos tend to focus more on the strong time the time existed prior to the normal time and all of the supernatural associations such as how certain phenomenons occurred mainly due to gods will or that some. The distinction between what Karen Armstrong following earlier scholars currently refers to as mythos and logos is more familiar in other guises such as art versus science spirituality.

Mythos helps people to address the larger issues of the meaning of life and the nature of ultimate reality. The terms mythos and logos are used to describe the transition in ancient Greek thought from the stories of gods goddesses and heroes mythos to the gradual development of rational philosophy and logic logos. No sharp dichotomy between mythos versus logos was stated at least up to the fourth century BC.

Logos is roughly speaking knowledge gained through the world of science reason and observation through which we can understand the material world and the things in it the laws of cause and effect in our. Mythos and logos. Rhetoric Logos is a rational explanation which is concerned with accuracy.

The Science Of Evolution Openlearn Open University

Precis On Armstrong Mythos And Logos Docx Precis On Armstrong Mythos And Logos In The Article Mythos And Logos By Karen Armstrong She Expresses Course Hero

Pdf Mythos And Logos